Author: bpaghana

‘Their practice is very professional. They are very time conscious and are always ahead of the agreed schedule. Their staff are very knowledgeable and very patient. They are always ready to support and respond promptly to enquiries.” ...

“B&P Associates is a hands-on law firm, always ready to learn and appreciate the working dynamics of the client and tailor the services to meet the client’s expectations. They are very prompt in their responses to client’s concerns and worries. They deploy lots of technology...

“For an international company such as the one I’m running, B & P Associates has been an extremely valuable legal services provider in all areas -from commercial to labour law etc. They also are smart enough to reach out to other specialised firms when they...

“The team is made up of young and energetic lawyers who make good use of technology. The members of the firm exhibit a high sense of professionalism and expertise. The key strength of the team is that the members take time to understand the business...

‘B&P Associates consistently provides advice that is not only legally robust, but also demonstrates an appreciation of the risks to our business from the particular transaction being contemplated, together with potential mitigating measures. Over the years, the firm has strengthened its expertise in the Energy...

The IAWL Leadership Academy curates discussions and power-chats with distinguished women in law across Africa and the Diaspora who share their experiences, strategies and triumphs in their careers in law. The diverse range of speakers and topics explores contemporary issues, and provide innovative solutions and...

The Oxford Business Group (OBG) and B&P Associates signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) of exclusive partnership under which B&P Associates produced the Legal Framework Chapter of OBG’s publication, “The Report: Ghana 2022”.   The Legal Framework Chapter of The Report provides a detailed analyses of landmark...

“… we reject the view of the trial judge, supported by the interested party, that in enacting C.I.132, the rule maker intended to take away the well-settled jurisdiction of the High Court in relation to applications for stay of execution and of proceedings pending appeal.” After...

error: Content is protected !!